As we previously reported, on November 22, 2016, a federal district court judge in Texas issued a nationwide preliminary injunction enjoining the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) from implementing and enforcing the new Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime rules that were supposed to apply on December 1, 2016. The injunction essentially put the implementation of the new regulations on hold pending further litigation.
After the injunction ruling, the DOL appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals asking for an expedited appeal. The Fifth Circuit granted the DOLs request, but after the election of President Trump, the DOL asked the Fifth Circuit to delay the case by extending the deadline for the DOL to file an appellate reply brief. The Fifth Circuit granted that request and extended the deadline to file the brief to March 2, 2017. In February 2017, the DOL asked for an additional 60 days, until May 1, 2017, to file its brief to allow incoming leadership personnel adequate time to consider the issues. The Fifth Circuit granted this unopposed request.
Some have speculated that the DOL asked for the additional 60 day extension based on Andrew Puzder's withdrawal as a candidate for Secretary of Labor. The thought was that the requested additional time would give the new nominee, Alexander Acosta, time to assess the governments position on the new FLSA rules. However, as of now, Mr. Acosta has not been confirmed as Secretary of Labor. Mr. Puzder was an outspoken critic of the new rules and it was expected that he would take steps to drop the DOLs defense of the rule. Mr. Acosta has not yet taken a public position on the new rules. As a result, it is unclear how the DOL will handle the ongoing appeal.
In the meantime, the Texas court denied a motion by the DOL to stay the continuance of the action pending the outcome of the appeal. The judge denied that motion stating that the DOL has not shown that it is likely to succeed on the merits of the underlying case. As a result, the underlying lawsuit seeking to permanently enjoin the new rules is still pending and is working its way to a final decision on the merits of the case.
At this point, we do not know what position will be taken by the Trump administration. Most pundits are speculating that the Trump administration will stop implantation of the new rules by dismissing the appeal and not defending the rules in the lower court. However, it is possible that the administration may take steps to allow the rules to take effect (possibly retroactive to December 1, 2016). Hopefully, we will know more by May 1.
Dorraine Larison concentrates her practice in the areas of bankruptcy law, debtor/creditor law, and employment law. She has extensive experience in the areas of commercial financing, creditors’ rights, and creditor ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.