Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Modern Workplace

Supreme Court Finds Highly Compensated Supervisor Entitled to Overtime Pay Under the FLSA
Posted in Wage & Hour

In a recent opinion (Helix Energy Sols. Grp., Inc. v Hewitt), the Supreme Court held that a highly compensated supervisor paid on a daily-rate basis was not an executive exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA) overtime pay requirement because he was not paid on a salary basis.

Hewitt, an offshore oil rig supervisor, filed the action against his former employer, Helix Energy Solutions Group, seeking overtime pay under the FLSA which guarantees overtime pay to covered employees when they work more than 40 hours in a workweek. Hewitt was paid on a daily-rate basis from 2014 to 2017 and earned over $200,000 annually. Hewitt typically worked 12 hours a day, seven days a week during a 28-day period. Hewitt then had 28 days off before reporting back to the vessel. Helix asserted Hewitt was exempt from the FLSA because he qualified as a “bona fide executive.”

To qualify for the executive exemption, an employee must meet certain tests relating to the employee’s job duties and be paid on a salary basis of not less than a set amount per week. The critical issue addressed by the Court was whether Hewitt was paid on a salary basis under the regulation setting forth the salary basis requirements (29 CFR § 541.602(a)). Under that regulation, an employee is paid on a salary basis only if the employee receives the full salary for any week in which the employee performs work without regard to the number of days or hours worked. Hewitt was paid only for the days he worked and while his salary exceeded the required minimum pay, he was not paid a guaranteed weekly salary. The Court noted in its opinion that a “true salary” is “a steady stream of pay, which the employer cannot vary, and the employee may thus rely on week after week.” Because Hewitt was not paid on a salary basis, the executive exemption requirements were not met, and he was entitled to overtime pay.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Blog Authors

Recent Posts