Blog Banner Image

The Modern Workplace

NLRB Upholds Employers Firing Based on Employees Facebook Post
Finally, the NLRB has sided with an employer in a Facebook firing case. On October 1st, the NLRB issued its decision in the Karl Knauz Motors, Inc. case, upholding a car dealerships decision to fire a sales employee based on his Facebook postings.
As mentioned in a previous post the NLRB filed a complaint against the Knauz BMW dealership in May 2011 after the dealership fired a sales employee who had posted critical comments on Facebook about the dealership serving low-end food and drinks at an event promoting a luxury car. Other dealership employees had access to the Facebook page.
In its October 1st decision, the NLRB found that the car dealership did not violate federal labor law, because the sales employee was not fired for his negative postings about the dealerships sales event. Instead, the employee was fired for posting pictures and a sarcastic comment on Facebook regarding a motor vehicle accident involving a customer.
Under federal labor law, non-management employees in both unionized and non-unionized work settings have the right to engage in concerted activity for their mutual aid and protection, including group discussions about improvements in the terms and conditions of employment. The Facebook postings regarding the motor vehicle accident were found not to constitute protected concerted activity, because, the NLRB said, the posting was a lark, without any discussion with any other employee and there was no connection to any of the employees terms and conditions of employment. Because the employees other posts about the dealerships sales event did not cause the employees termination, the NLRB did not have to decide whether those posts were legally protected by federal labor law.
While the NLRB upheld the car dealerships firing decision, it also reaffirmed its position that overbroad technology policies violate federal labor law. In the Knauz case, the NLRB found that the dealerships courtesy rule in its employee handbook was unlawful. The NLRB reasoned that the rule, which asked employees not to be disrespectful or use language that injured the employers image or reputation, would cause a reasonable employee to believe that legally protected statements of protest or criticism were prohibited. The NLRB ordered the dealership to remove the courtesy rule from its handbook. This aspect of the NLRBs ruling in Knauz serves as an important reminder that employers technology policies must balance the employers rights and business needs with employees right to engage in legally protected online activity.
Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
















Blog Authors

Recent Posts