Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Modern Workplace

Minneapolis Wants a Piece of the Wage Theft Pie
Posted in Wage & Hour

On the heels of the new Minnesota state wage theft law, which went into effect on July 1st, the Minneapolis City Council has proposed a city wage theft ordinance. The proposed Minneapolis ordinance mirrors the new state law in many respects, but includes some additional requirements. The Citys ordinance would require employers to put all pay agreements in writing and provide regular written or electronic earnings statements to workers. The proposal also includes a streamlined resolution process for wage disputes that does not require an employee to have an attorney and creates a presumption of retaliation if any adverse employment action occurs within 90 days of a wage complaint. A companion proposal brought by the City Council would expand these employee protections to freelance workers, such as independent contractors and ride-share drivers.

Minneapolis City Council members and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey have advocated that a city ordinance would complement the new state law and provide additional enforcement support at the local level, but many local business leaders are less enthusiastic. In a letter sent to the Mayor, a coalition of business leaders asked the City to hit pause on the wage theft initiative, arguing that the City has not allowed enough time for the state law to take hold to see if anything local is warranted. The business leaders also pushed back on the additional paperwork and administrative burdens posed by the Citys proposed ordinance. City Council Members have responded to the request by saying that there are no plans to back away from the Citys initiative.

Only time will tell if the City will, in fact, follow through with the local ordinance and if its efforts will be as successful as the sick and safe leave and $15 minimum wage ordinances enacted in recent years. Public hearings and other public input opportunities are expected later this year.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Blog Authors

Recent Posts