Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Modern Workplace

Federal Judge Strikes Down Obama Administrations FLSA Overtime Rule
Federal Judge Strikes Down Obama Administrations FLSA Overtime Rule
Last Thursday, August 31, 2017, a federal district court judge in Texas struck down the Obama administrations long-embattled federal overtime pay rule. The rule would have more than doubled the minimum weekly salary required to qualify for the federal Fair Labor Standards Acts (FLSA) white collar exemptions (from $455 per week to $913 per week). The rule was originally scheduled to go into effect on December 1, 2016, but the same Texas-based judge enjoined its implementation late last year.
As a quick refresher, the FLSA requires non-exempt employees to receive no less than the federal minimum wage for all hours worked and one and one half times their regular hourly rate for all hours worked above forty in a week. The FLSA contains a number of exemptions to these rules, including an exemption for any employee employed in a bona fide executive, administrative, or professional capacity. For an employee to qualify for one of these white collar exemptions under current FLSA regulations, the employee must meet three criteria: (1) the employee must be paid on a salary basis; (2) the employee must be paid at least the minimum salary level established by the regulations, currently $455 per week ($23,660 annually); and (3) the employee must perform executive, administrative, or professional capacity duties.
 
After the Obama administration published its FLSA rule to raise the minimum weekly salary for white collar exempt employees to $913 per week ($47,476 annually), more than 55 business groups and 20 states sued the US Department of Labor challenging the rule. In last weeks decision striking down the Obama administrations rule, Judge Amos Mazzant ruled that the Department of Labor exceeded its authority in issuing the new rule. Judge Mazzant explained that the FLSA requires an exemption to be based both on salary and the duties being performed by an employee. The Judge reasoned that the Obama administrations rule would raise the white collar weekly salary so high that it would render an analysis of workers duties irrelevant. Judge Mazzant concluded that this is not what Congress intended. The Obama administrations rule also would have provided for automatic upward adjustments to the weekly salary threshold every three years. Judge Mazzant declared that portion of the rule invalid as well.
 
Because Judge Mazzant had previously blocked the implementation of the Obama administrations rule, employers do not need to make any changes based on the August 31st ruling. The existing regulations, last updated in 2004 and setting the minimum salary level at $455 per week, are still in effect for now. While the Department of Labor could theoretically appeal Judge Mazzant's order, it is likely that the Department will not do so under the Trump administration. Indeed, the Department of Labor has sent a Request for Information related to the overtime rule to the Office of Management and Budget for review, suggesting the Department is likely to issue a revised proposed rule at some point. The Departments process would include an opportunity for the public to submit comments about any new proposed rule, including proposed changes to the salary threshold. Employers should expect the minimum white collar salary level to increase in the future, but likely to a lesser degree than in the struck-down rule.
Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Blog Authors

Recent Posts