Yesterday I wrote a post reminding readers about the EEOC litigation focus on inflexible leave policies, which raises the question: what should employers be doing to avoid liability in this area?
Despite these requirements, many employers have implemented strict attendance policies, policies that limit the amount of time an employee can take as leave, or policies that place strict conditions on employees return to work. The motivation for these policies is not necessarily bad inflexible policies that apply equally to everyone ensure consistent treatment of employees. However, under the ADA, if an employee suffers from a disability (and disability is broadly defined to include many, many non-temporary medical conditions), employers are not allowed to be inflexible. Rather, employers must consider, with an open mind, employee accommodation requests.
So, here are some tips:
- First, employers covered by the ADA should never have a black and white policy on the maximum duration of leave available to employees. Even generous leave policies of one year or more are problematic if the limits are strict and do not allow for accommodations. Employers must be willing to consider a longer period if necessary to reasonably accommodate the employee's disability.
- Leave policies that place general limits on available leave should also say that additional leaves may be available in accordance with applicable law.
- Policies that prohibit an employee from returning to work until they have no restrictions are unlawful. While some work restrictions may effectively prevent an employee from being able to perform the essential functions of his or her position, employers are required to consider whether the restrictions can be reasonably accommodated. If an employer finds itself having difficulty accommodating a particular restriction, its a good idea to consult with legal counsel about the issue and potential next steps.
- Attendance policies should be closely examined to ensure that disabled employees and employees on FMLA leaves of absence are not inappropriately subject to negative treatment because of their protected absences.
- Finally, employers must consider qualified disabled employees for open positions on the same basis as other employees. Any program that restricts certain light-duty jobs to a certain class of individuals (i.e. those returning from a workplace injury) is likely to run afoul of the ADA.
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.