Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Modern Workplace

Continuing COVID-19 Related Employment Developments: Modifications to Workers Compensation Coverage and Unemployment Benefits


In the continued wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous states have recently taken steps, through either new legislation or executive orders issued by governors, to expand both workers compensation and unemployment benefits in circumstances tied to COVID-19. We highlight Minnesota developments as examples.

Workers Compensation Benefits for Essential Workers:  

Newly enacted legislation in Minnesota creates a presumption of workers compensation coverage for various categories of workers who contract COVID-19. Categories of covered workers include first responders, health care workers, and childcare workers. Frequently Asked Questions on the new law can be found here. Other states, such as Missouri, have taken similar steps, regarding at least first responders. 
 
Workers compensation laws, including Minnesota's statute, typically require an employee seeking coverage for an occupational disease to show a direct causal connection between the disease or illness and the workplace. Under the new Minnesota law, the employer now has the burden to show that the employment was not a direct cause of the illness (a heightened proof standard). 



Unemployment Benefits:   
Minnesota Governor Walz recently amended a previous executive order addressing eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. That initial executive order (EO 20-05) suspends strict compliance with the unemployment insurance benefits statute and made several modifications to the pre-existing requirements for benefits eligibility. The executive order also provides that benefits paid as a result of the pandemic shall not be computed when setting the future unemployment tax rate for an employer.
The amendments to EO 20-05 include further suspension of pre-existing statutory limitations on the receipt of unemployment insurance benefits and set out an employee notification requirement. The first amendment suspends enforcement of a statutory limitation which delays unemployment benefits for any week an applicant is receiving, has received, or will receive vacation pay, sick pay, or personal time off (PTO) pay. 
 
The executive order also requires Minnesota employers that separate employees to notify the employees of their right to file for unemployment.  Most states have adopted a similar requirement, because the new Federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) includes such a notice mandate as a requirement for participation in the federal unemployment benefit programs. The CARES Act provides for additional, supplemental unemployment benefits tied to COVID-19, if certain conditions are satisfied. Although the Minnesota executive order does not mandate that the notice be in writing, we believe best practice to be to do so. That would allow easy proof of compliance. The executive order does not specifically address furloughs, but the safest approach would be to provide similar written notice to furloughed employees.  
Employers in all states should ensure that they are up to date on any changes to their respective states laws on various employment-related issues resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak.
Last week, we pointed you to several Legal Alerts our firm published on several COVID-19 related laws and regulations. See here another recent Legal Alert we published regarding required employer documentation for paid leaves and related tax credits.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Blog Authors

Recent Posts