Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Wisconsin Appeals Court Rejects Seventh Circuit's Community of Interest Test

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals has rejected Seventh Circuit jurisprudence concerning the “community of interest” test as applied to the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL). In The Water Quality Store v. Dynasts Spas, Inc., 2010 Wisc. App. Lexis 550 (Wisc. Ct. App. Jul. 15 2010), a Wisconsin retailer had been selling the defendant manufacturer’s line of spa and spa equipment, on a nearly exclusive basis, for approximately seven years. The manufacturer terminated the relationship without good cause and without observing the notice and opportunity to cure requirements of the WFDL. On summary judgment, the manufacturer argued that the WFDL did not apply to the parties’ relationship because the retailer could not establish that there was a “community of interest” between the parties, as required under the WFDL. Wisconsin Supreme Court cases interpreting the WFDL have set forth a multi-pronged test for the community of interest requirement, looking at ten different facets of the manufacturer’s relationship with the dealer. For WFDL cases arising in federal court, the Seventh Circuit has articulated a slightly different test for community of interest, looking to whether the manufacturer has a bargaining power advantage so as to have the dealer “over a barrel” in the relationship. More recent Seventh Circuit cases have interpreted the “over a barrel” test such that if the dealer has been able to replace the manufacturer’s line of products with a substitute brand, the manufacturer is deemed not to have the dealer “over a barrel,” negating the existence of a community of interest and, as a result, application of the WFDL.

The Wisconsin Court of Appeals rejected the Seventh Circuit approach and reaffirmed the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s ten-facet test. Evidence that the plaintiff had successfully mitigated its damages by replacing the manufacturer’s line of spas with a competitor’s products was deemed irrelevant. Denial of the defendant’s summary judgment motion was therefore upheld. The decision underscores the significant differences in the way community of interest will be analyzed in Wisconsin state court versus in the federal court system. This provides manufacturers with greater incentive to secure federal court jurisdiction whenever possible in WFDL cases.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors