In another vicarious liability case, a federal court in Tennessee granted summary judgment in favor of Country Inn & Suites By Radisson, dismissing claims that it was liable for the alleged actions of its franchisee’s employee. Faulkner v. Country Inn & Suites By Radisson, Inc., 2021 WL 1143856 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 24, 2021). Lathrop GPM is counsel to Country Inn & Suites (CI&S). The lawsuit alleged Kevin Faulkner was assaulted by an employee of a CI&S franchisee, and sought to hold CI&S directly and vicariously liable for battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of the assault.
In considering CI&S’s motion for summary judgment, the court concluded that CI&S’s License Agreement demonstrated it did not have control over the day-to-day activities of the franchisee’s hotel, and therefore, could not be vicariously liable for the franchisee’s employees. In an attempt to circumvent these arguments, Faulkner argued CI&S was liable through apparent agency stemming from the use of CI&S’s marks at the franchisee’s hotel. The court held that the facts, instead, demonstrated merely a franchisee-franchisor relationship between the parties and highlighted a previous observation from the Middle District of Tennessee that if branding could create apparent authority, this “would effectively transform every franchisor-franchisee relationship into an agency relationship” — an unworkable notion. The court further relied on a Tennessee statute explicitly stating employees of franchisees are not employees of franchisors, negating any contention CI&S could be directly liable for the actions of its franchisee’s employees.
Maisa Frank represents clients in a variety of litigation matters. Whether conducting pre-dispute investigations, navigating litigation, or negotiating resolutions, Maisa’s advice and strategy is vital to clients facing ...
Richard Landon is a trial and appellate attorney who advises and represents businesses resolving disputes in antitrust, distribution, and franchising, as well as shareholder disputes and other complex commercial litigation ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.