A putative antitrust class action against a shock absorber manufacturer may proceed in federal court, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held, affirming denial of the manufacturer’s motion to compel arbitration. In re: Auto. Parts Antitrust Litig., 951 F.3d 377 (6th Cir. 2020). This dispute arose after retailers of automotive parts brought antitrust claims against KYB Corporation and KYB Americas Corporation. KYB manufactures car parts and distributes them through its subsidiary KYB Americas, which contracts with a network of retailers who then resell the parts to individual consumers. After the retailers filed suit in federal court in Michigan, the defendants moved to compel arbitration. The district court denied the motion, concluding the parties did not form an agreement to arbitrate, and defendants appealed.
The agreements between the retailers and KYB Americas did not contain an arbitration provision. Nonetheless, the defendants argued that the retailers were required under their agreements to honor the terms and conditions of KYB’s limited warranty, and the warranty required the arbitration of disputes with “original retail purchasers.” However, the court held that the “original retail purchasers” referenced in the warranty were the buyers of the parts from the retailers, not the retail sellers themselves. Thus, neither the retailer plaintiffs nor the manufacturer and distributor defendants had agreed to arbitrate any dispute between the retailers and the defendants, and the district court’s decision was affirmed.
Maisa Frank represents clients in a variety of litigation matters. Whether conducting pre-dispute investigations, navigating litigation, or negotiating resolutions, Maisa’s advice and strategy is vital to clients facing ...
Richard Landon is a trial and appellate attorney who advises and represents businesses resolving disputes in antitrust, distribution, and franchising, as well as shareholder disputes and other complex commercial litigation ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.