Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Second Circuit Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment to Hotel Franchisor and Enforces Liquidated Damages Provision
Posted in Terminations

The Second Circuit affirmed a grant of summary judgment in favor of hotel franchisor HLT Existing Franchise Holding LLC, dismissing a former franchisee's claim that HLT improperly terminated the franchise agreement and permitting HLT to recover liquidated damages. HLT Existing Franchise Holding LLC v. Worcester Hospitality Grp., LLC, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS (2d Cir. Apr. 9, 2015). The terminated Hampton Inn franchisee, Worcester Hospitality Group, LLC (WHG), argued that the district court erred in three respects, contending that: (1) HLT had violated the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by conducting on-site inspections of the hotel in an arbitrary or irrational manner; (2) the district court should have excluded guest surveys that reflected customer dissatisfaction as inadmissible hearsay; and (3) the contractual liquidated damages term—which awarded HLT three years' worth of estimated future royalties if HLT terminated the agreement due to WHG's breach—was unreasonable based on record evidence that HLT could construct a new Hampton Inn in less than one year.

The Second Circuit affirmed. It held that the application of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing was inapposite because the allegedly arbitrary or irrational inspections were not HLT's sole basis for terminating the agreement. Because WHG also received failing scores on guest surveys, HLT had an independent, contractually-permitted reason for termination. The guest surveys were not hearsay because they were not admitted to show the truth of the matter asserted. Rather, they were admissible evidence that HLT reasonably believed that guests were dissatisfied. The surveys were also exempted from hearsay as records of a regularly conducted business activity. Finally, the court found that evidence regarding the timeframe for constructing a new Hampton Inn was irrelevant to the reasonableness of the liquidated damages. Instead, the parties' assessment of how quickly HLT could replace WHG as a franchisee and reopen the existing Hampton Inn was the appropriate measure for calculating liquidated damages. Thus, HLT was entitled to contractual liquidated damages.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors