Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Pennsylvania Federal Court Compels Individual Arbitration of Claims Asserted by 90 Franchisees
Posted in Arbitration

Similarly, a federal court in Pennsylvania has dismissed a lawsuit brought by 90 hotel franchisees, enforcing the arbitration provisions in their franchise agreements and ordering all 90 franchisees to arbitrate their claims individually. Jai Sai Baba LLC v. Choice Hotels Int'l Inc., 2021 WL 1049994 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 19, 2021). The franchise agreements entered into between Choice Hotels and its franchisees contained binding arbitration provisions, which, among other things, prohibited prehearing discovery. Most of the franchise agreements also included a class action wavier, but some agreements were silent as to class arbitration. Despite the arbitration and waiver provisions, 90 franchisees filed suit together
against Choice Hotels, alleging a variety of federal and state law claims. Choice Hotels moved to compel arbitration.

The court rejected the franchisees’ arguments that these agreements to arbitrate were unenforceable. The court found that neither the arbitration provisions’ limitation of discovery nor the additional costs of arbitration prevented the franchisees from effectively vindicating their federal statutory rights. Nor did these factors render the arbitration provisions unconscionable in this business setting. Finding the arbitration provisions in the franchise agreements were enforceable, the court compelled arbitration. It further found that it lacked the basis to compel class arbitration and ordered individual arbitration for all the franchisees.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors