Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

New York Federal Court Rejects Former Employees’ Attempt to Apply Single Integrated Enterprise Doctrine to Franchisor
Posted in Employment

A federal district court in New York granted franchisor Just Salad’s motion for summary judgment on all claims against it and against various franchisees who never employed the plaintiffs. Tecocoatzi-Ortiz, v. Just Salad, LLC, 2022 WL 596831 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2022). A group of former employees brought a putative class action against franchisor Just Salad and various franchisees, alleging violations of federal and state labor laws. The former employees alleged that Just Salad and its franchisees should be held liable as a single employer under the “single integrated enterprise” theory because certain human resource functions were centralized across locations, district managers worked with the general managers of certain locations, and various policies applied across all locations. The plaintiffs moved for class certification, and the defendants moved for summary judgment.

The court granted summary judgment to Just Salad and the franchisees who had never employed the plaintiffs, rejecting the single integrated enterprise theory. The court held that the employees failed to demonstrate how the stores where the employees did not work had any control or supervision over them, how the operations of different stores were interrelated, or that all the Just Salad stores are part of the same corporate structure or under common ownership or management. The court also denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, concluding it failed to meet any of the requirements for class certification. In particular, there was a lack of commonality in the class’s claim. Because the plaintiffs could not show that the franchisor and franchisees formed a single integrated enterprise, they were unable to show the requisite commonality to their claims against their various employers. The court did, however, permit the plaintiffs’ claims to proceed against their individual franchisee employers.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors