A federal court in New Jersey has denied a franchisor’s motion for summary judgment on its claim for breach of contract by its franchisee, finding that the franchisee raised issues of material fact regarding whether it had been fraudulently induced to sign its franchise agreement based on an oral promise. Travelodge Hotels, Inc. v. Durga, LLC, 2023 WL 314313 (D.N.J. Jan. 19, 2023). Travelodge alleged that Durga breached the franchise agreement by failing to pay required liquidated damages, outstanding recurring fees, and costs. Durga argued in response to Travelodge’s summary judgment motion that its failure to pay the amounts alleged did not constitute a breach of contract because Travelodge had fraudulently induced Durga to enter into the franchise agreement and delayed its access to the Travelodge reservation system.
The court denied the summary judgment motion, holding that the integration clause contained in the franchise agreement did not bar the franchisee’s claim of fraudulent inducement. The court concluded that documentary evidence and deposition testimony from one of Durga’s corporate representatives raised a material question as to the validity of the franchise agreement. The testimony asserted that Durga signed the franchise agreement based on an oral promise that its Travelodge hotel would be converted into a different Wyndham Hotel Group brand. Further testimony asserted that Durga was denied access to the Travelodge reservation system, either completely or due to technical issues inhibiting its use.
- Associate
Kevin is a Franchise & Distribution Associate who assists clients in asset acquisitions and dispositions, commercial contracts and franchise matters.
Prior to joining Lathrop GPM, Kevin was a transactional attorney, where he ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.