Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

New Jersey Federal Court Enters Default Judgment Against Franchisee and Guarantors

A federal court in New Jersey recently entered a $357,917.22 default judgment in favor of a franchisor. Americinn Int'l, LLC v. Mataj12 Corp., 2022 WL 1773779 (D.N.J. June 1, 2022). Franchisee Mataj12 repeatedly failed to pay franchisor Americinn various recurring fees required under the franchise agreement, and entered into a settlement agreement to address the arrears by making installment payments. Mataj12 also executed a consent to the entry of judgment in the amount of $202,555.54 should it fail to make the settlement payments. Americinn sued for breach of contract when Mataj12 failed to make the installment payments and failed to pay additional recurring fees due under the franchise agreement. Neither Mataj12 nor its guarantors responded to the complaint.

Following entry of default, the court granted Americinn’s request for $357,917.22 in damages pursuant to the franchise agreement, which included the amount payable for the recurring fees plus interest of 1.5% per month for past due payments. After concluding that it could exercise jurisdiction over the case, the court found default judgment to be proper, as the defendants’ failure to respond indicated that they had no meritorious defense, determined that Americinn would suffer prejudice by not being able to collect for the damages caused by Mataj12, and decided that defendants were culpable due to their not participating in the litigation.

*Andy Ranc is a Summer Associate for Lathrop GPM who contributed to the writing of this post.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors