A federal court in New Jersey recently granted salon franchisor Fantastic Sams summary judgment against former franchisees that failed to make payments required under a previous settlement agreement. Fantastic Sams Franchise Corp. v. Weekes, 2023 WL 2696595 (D.N.J. Mar. 29, 2023). In 2017, Fantastic Sams settled a dispute with its former franchisees Boynton Weekes and George Jackson, with Weekes and Jackson agreeing to pay Fantastic Sams $85,000 over a four-year period. If Weekes and Jackson defaulted on their payment obligations, the settlement entitled Fantastic Sams to an immediate consent judgment for the amount still owed. In October 2017, after making some initial installment payments, Weekes and Jackson informed Fantastic Sams that they would no longer be able to meet their obligations. In September 2021, Fantastic Sams brought a lawsuit seeking a consent judgment under the settlement agreement. Jackson and Weekes argued Fantastic Sams waived any default by waiting nearly three years to enforce its rights and that laches barred any recovery.
The court rejected both arguments asserted by Jackson and Weekes. Applying Massachusetts law, as required by the settlement agreement, the court first held that Weekes and Jackson could not meet their burden to establish that a three-year delay in bringing suit showed that Fantastic Sams unequivocally intended to forfeit its contractual rights, “such that no other reasonable explanation of [the] conduct is possible.” Second, the court held that the equitable doctrine of laches was not available as a defense against Fantastic Sams’ legal claim. As long as there was no statute of limitations issue, as a matter of law, delay in pursuing a legal claim could not constitute laches. Furthermore, Weekes and Jackson could not meet their burden to show that any delay on Fantastic Sams’ part caused prejudice.
Justin litigates commercial disputes across the country on behalf of both corporations and individuals. He regularly counsels and represents some of the nation’s most prominent franchisors on matters central to the integrity ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.