A federal court in New Jersey denied a motion for preliminary injunction because of the franchisor’s delay in seeking relief. H-1 Auto Care, LLC v. Lasher, 2022 WL 13003468 (D.N.J. Oct. 21, 2022). In October 2020, franchisee Balhar Lasher told franchisor H-1 that he planned to close his two H-1 Auto Care businesses and file for bankruptcy due to the COVID-19 pandemic. When H-1 offered financial support in response, Lasher agreed to continue to operate one of the locations. He stopped reporting sales to H-1, however, and in January 2021 H-1 discovered that he had formed new corporate entities to operate competing businesses from the sites of each former franchise. H-1 sued Lasher, his entities, and certain of his employees on October 5, 2021, and moved for preliminary injunction on November 23. After the parties repeatedly requested extensions on their briefings, the court terminated the motion and ordered the parties to serve remaining briefs upon each other and refile when the briefing was complete. H-1 refiled its motion on March 14, 2022.
The court limited its analysis to H-1’s showing of irreparable harm and held that H-1’s delay of eleven months between learning of Lasher’s formation of new corporate entities and its initial filing of the motion undercut its allegation that it faced irreparable harm if the injunction were not granted. Because H-1 made no effort to explain or justify its delay, the court found this factor dispositive and denied H-1’s motion.
Bob Zisk concentrates his practice on franchise and distribution and commercial litigation.
Bob has extensive experience as a franchise litigator and counselor. For over thirty years, he has represented national franchisors in ...
Jason Johnson is a trial and appellate attorney who represents clients involved in civil litigation and arbitration. Jason focuses his practice on franchise litigation, including antitrust, class actions, unfair competition ...
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.