Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Motion to Dismiss Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims Denied

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently denied a franchisor’s motion to dismiss claims of fraud and misrepresentation, and allowed the franchisee to proceed with claims that the franchisor misrepresented the feasibility of the independent contractor business model. The parties in Andersen v. Griswold Int’l, LLC, Case No. 3:14-cv-02560 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2014), entered into a franchise agreement under which Andersen operated a nonmedical home care business. He claimed that before the sale of the franchise, Griswold made representations regarding the operation of the business, including that it would be operated under an independent contractor model and that he would not have to comply with applicable wage and hour laws when engaging home care workers. Later, California enacted a law requiring that nonmedical home care workers be paid overtime, and Griswold abandoned the independent contractor model, instructing its franchisees to employ the caregivers. Andersen sued alleging, among other claims, fraud and misrepresentation.

Griswold moved to dismiss the fraud and misrepresentation claims on the basis that it was unable to predict the change in California law and that other statements made to Andersen were mere puffery. The court disagreed and found that, although the change in California law was a prediction of a future event and thus not actionable, Andersen’s claims survived because he alleged Griswold represented to him that federal laws would protect the independent contractor model even if state law changed and that Griswold concealed from him that the model was being challenged in other jurisdictions. Griswold also was found to have made some representations too specific to be puffery.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here


















Blog Authors