Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Minnesota Federal Court Rules that Fraud and Misrepresentation Claims Against Franchise Broker Fail Because Alleged Misrepresentations Were Puffery

A federal court in Minnesota dismissed all claims against a franchise broker because the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the broker made false statements about past or present facts or circumstances. Mount Holly Kickboxing, LLC v. FranChoice, Inc., 2021 WL 117968 (D. Minn. Mar. 24, 2021). FranChoice was a franchise broker for the iLoveKickboxing.com (ILKB) franchise system and was involved in the sale of a franchise to the franchisee, Mount Holly. Mount Holly claimed that, during the sales process, FranChoice misrepresented whether the franchise was suitable for absentee or semi-absentee ownership, the estimated initial investment, the success of franchisees, and made financial performance representations that were not disclosed in ILKB’s FDD. Mount Holly brought claims against FranChoice for fraud and misrepresentation and violations of statutory franchise sales and deceptive practices acts.

The court granted summary judgment for FranChoice and dismissed all claims with prejudice, holding that all but one of the alleged statements Mount Holly relied upon were based either upon puffery or on future events, which are not actionable fraud, and that it failed to present any evidence that those statements did not reflect past or present circumstances at the time the statements were made. The one alleged statement that was based upon a past fact was FranChoice’s claim that no ILKB franchises had ever closed. However, because the statement was directly contradicted by the FDD that listed ILKB’s closed franchises, the court concluded that Mount Holly could not demonstrate justifiable reliance on that statement.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors