Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Krispy Kreme Obtains Post-Termination Injunction Against Former Franchisee Under Heightened Standard

In Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp. v. Satellite Donuts, L.L.C., 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73913 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 22, 2010), a franchisor obtained a preliminary injunction against its former franchisee. Krispy Kreme had terminated the franchise agreement after Satellite failed to pay royalties and other amounts, but Satellite continued to operate as a Krispy Kreme store after termination. Krispy Kreme brought suit seeking a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to stop Satellite from using its trademarks and proprietary materials.

In granting the franchisor’s motion, the court found that Krispy Kreme demonstrated a “clear and substantial likelihood” of success on the merits, meeting the heightened standard in cases where the preliminary injunction is either “mandatory” or would “provide the movant with all of the relief sought and that relief cannot be undone even if the defendant prevails on a trial on the merits.” The court found that Satellite was undisputedly in default under the franchise agreement—Satellite conceded that it owed Krispy Kreme more than $235,000. In addition, the court held that although Krispy Kreme titled its termination letter as a “cease and desist” letter rather than a “notice of termination,” the letter constituted effective notice of termination under the franchise agreement. Thus, Krispy Kreme successfully demonstrated a clear and substantial likelihood of success on the merits of its breach of contract and Lanham Act claims.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors