Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Franchisor Granted Summary Judgment in Slip and Fall Case

Burger King has prevailed on its motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit related to a slip and fall incident that occurred at a franchised restaurant. Cram v. Burger King Corp., 2019 WL 4095570 (D.N.H. Aug. 29, 2019). The incident occurred when plaintiff Elizabeth Cram’s foot got caught in a child’s highchair improperly placed next to the restroom entrance, causing her to fall and tear her Achilles tendon. Plaintiffs asserted negligence and vicarious liability claims against Burger King because it was the owner and lessor of the restaurant at issue. Burger King filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that it did not breach any duty owed to the customer. 

In its examination of the plaintiffs’ negligence claim, the court concluded that New Hampshire law does not impose an absolute duty on landowners and landlords, particularly where the premises are controlled by another party. Instead, the court noted that landlords must exercise reasonable care not to subject others to an unreasonable risk of harm. In this case, Burger King leased the premises to its franchisee, which assumed the primary duty to maintain the restaurant in good order and to take reasonable precautions to prevent injury. The court found no evidence that Burger King was involved in the restaurant’s maintenance or controlled the placement of the highchairs. The court’s analysis of the vicarious liability claim was nearly identical. The plaintiffs again argued that Burger King owed them a nondelegable duty to maintain a safe premises, but Burger King did not retain possession or control of the restaurant and did not exercise control over the location and placement of the highchairs in the restaurant. As a result, the court granted summary judgment in favor of Burger King.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors