Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Formerly Exclusive Distributor's Motion to Dismiss Is Granted in Part and Denied in Part by Federal Court

A Massachusetts federal court granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in a distribution contract. Bruno Int'l Ltd. v. Vicor Corp., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123556 (D. Mass. Sept. 16, 2015). For nearly 25 years, Bruno had been the exclusive Israeli distributor for Vicor, a Massachusetts supplier of modular power components and power systems. Then, Vicor notified Bruno that it would not renew its exclusive distribution contract. Approximately one month later, the parties signed an agreement providing for nonexclusive distribution and promotion of the Vicor's products in Israel. In 2012, three years after the parties began the nonexclusive distribution relationship, Vicor terminated the parties' agreement citing Bruno's reduction in new business generation. Bruno alleged that the termination was actually due to Vicor's preference for a new distributor.

Under Massachusetts law, a party may breach the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing without actually breaching the contract itself. The court found that Bruno had pled cognizable claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing with regards to several actions. First, Vicor shared sensitive pricing information that it had required Bruno to provide in a confidential report. Second, Vicor favored the new distributor by selecting it for projects for which Bruno had performed the initial required project design. Whether Vicor's selections were made for "legitimate business reasons" or with the "intent to interfere with Bruno's ability to reap the benefits of its Agreement" were factual questions to be answered. Finally, Vicor made a direct sale to one of Bruno's customers, when under the Agreement Bruno could have reasonably expected to receive a commission from the sale. The court noted, however, that it is not a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing for a supplier to replace a long standing distributor, and it dismissed several other claims.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors