Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Discharge Injunction Does Not Prohibit Enforcement of Valid Non-Competition Clause
Posted in Bankruptcy

In In re Quattrin, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 1941 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. May 26, 2011), the debtor was a franchisee in the Total Car Franchising Corporation (“Total Car”) system at the time he filed for bankruptcy. During the bankruptcy case, the franchise agreement was terminated. The debtor subsequently received his bankruptcy discharge, which gave rise to the discharge injunction against the collection of discharged debts. Total Car thereafter sought to enforce its post-termination remedies under the franchise agreement, including enforcement of the two year non-competition clause.

The debtor alleged that Total Car’s efforts to enforce the non-competition clause violated the discharge injunction, and sought declaratory relief that his obligations, including the non-competition clause under the franchise agreement, were discharged. The court noted that some bankruptcy courts had held that non-competition obligations could be discharged in bankruptcy. In the absence of any binding precedent in the Ninth Circuit, however, the court adopted the analysis of two circuit court decisions holding that non-competition obligations cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Those decisions reasoned that a right to injunctive relief does not fall under the Bankruptcy Code’s broad definition of a “claim” or a “debt” and, therefore, that a right to injunctive relief against a debtor is not discharged in bankruptcy. Ultimately, the court held that, to the extent enforceable under state law, the non-competition clause in the Total Car franchise agreement was not discharged by the debtor’s bankruptcy discharge, and that Total Car had not violated the discharge injunction.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors