In Luther v. Kia Motors Am., Inc., 2009 WL 4906878 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2009), the court granted summary judgment to Kia on a rejected applicant’s claim that he had been promised a dealership. The applicant claimed that a Kia representative told him he had been approved at the regional level, and that in the past, those approved at that level were approved by the ultimate national-level decision makers. That constituted an oral contract, according to the applicant. The court disagreed, holding that the conversation did not amount to an oral contract, that the representative did not have the authority to bind the company, and that the applicant had not suffered any damages. It also held that the integration clause contained in the application, which expressly noted that only the written execution of a franchise agreement would constitute approval of the application, foreclosed the applicant’s claim.
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.
RSS Feed