Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Court Enjoins Dallas Business from Using Trademarked Frosting Pattern

A Texas federal court has granted an injunction to a Bundt cake franchisor seeking to prevent a competitor from using its trademarked frosting pattern on her cake products. Denbra IP Holdings, LLC v. Thornton, 2021 WL 674238 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 22, 2021). Plaintiff Denbra IP Holdings, LLC d/b/a Nothing Bundt Cakes has over 300 franchises around the United States and Canada selling Bundt cakes topped with its trademarked frosting pattern. The frosting pattern consists of long strips of tubular ring-shaped frosting that expands outward from the center of the cake. Twenty-one of its franchises are located in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. In August 2020, some of the Dallas-Fort Worth-area franchisees reported to Nothing Bundt Cakes that Defendant Thornton was selling Bundt cakes using its trademarked frosting pattern and operating under the name “Anything Bundt Cakes.” Nothing Bundt Cakes sent Thornton a demand letter and, in response, Thornton changed the name to “All About Bundt Cakes,” but continued utilizing the frosting pattern. Nothing Bundt Cakes sent Thornton a second demand letter, but she continued using the frosting pattern. Nothing Bundt Cakes then brought a motion for a preliminary injunction.

Thornton failed to appear in the matter. Nonetheless, the court determined that all four factors considered in the preliminary-injunction analysis weighed in Nothing Bundt Cakes’ favor and enjoined Thornton from using the frosting-pattern mark. First, the court determined that there was a substantial likelihood that Nothing Bundt Cakes would succeed on the merits because it has a protectable mark and Thornton’s use of the mark was likely to confuse customers. Second, the court concluded that Nothing Bundt Cakes would suffer irreparable harm because it has established goodwill in the Dallas-Fort Worth area that may be lost due to Thornton’s actions, and that it has lost control of its reputation. Third, the court found that the balance of equities weighs in Nothing Bundt Cakes’ favor because any damage suffered by Thornton to replace advertising materials or stop using the frosting pattern is minimal compared to the harm to Nothing Bundt Cakes’ reputation and its loss of goodwill. Lastly, the court concluded that enjoining Thornton will serve the public interest because the public interest “is always served” by enjoining the unauthorized use of a protected mark.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors