Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Court Enforces Noncompete Agreement Using Rule of Reason
Posted in Noncompetes

A federal court in Michigan recently applied the “rule of reason” doctrine in enforcing a covenant not to compete contained in a Little Caesar franchise agreement. Little Caesar Enters., Inc. v. Creative Rests., Inc., 2017 WL 4778721 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 23, 2017). The noncompete provision restricted the former franchisee from engaging in certain competitive conduct for a one-year period within any “Designated Market Area“ and for a two-year period within the Designated Market Area where the franchise at issue was located. The former franchisee moved for partial summary judgment arguing that the noncompete provision was governed by the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act’s reasonableness standard, and that under that standard it was unreasonable and unenforceable. However, the court held that under a recent ruling from the Supreme Court of Michigan, commercial noncompete provisions must be evaluated under the “rule of reason” doctrine, and not under the Michigan Antitrust Reform Act.

The court then held that the noncompete provision did not violate the “rule of reason.” Generally, a noncompete provision violates the “rule of reason” if it may suppress or destroy, rather than promote, competition. The court held that rather than showing that the noncompete agreement had anticompetitive effects in the overall pizza or quick-service restaurant market, the evidence tended to show healthy competition between pizza restaurants in the relevant geographic location. Moreover, although the defendants argued that they had suffered individual injury as a result of the noncompete, the court held that the “rule of reason” protects competition, not individual competitors. Accordingly, the court denied the former franchisee’s motion for partial summary judgment.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors