Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Court Denies Temporary Restraining Order to Prevent Termination of Dealership
Posted in Terminations

In Tolle Furn. Group, LLC v. La-Z-Boy Inc., 2009 WL 2160981 (W.D. Wash. July 17, 2009), a Washington federal court denied a motion for a temporary restraining order and refused to stop the termination of a furniture retailer who alleged that La-Z-Boy had violated the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act (“FIPA”). The court rejected the plaintiff’s contention that La-Z-Boy did not have good cause to terminate the retailer agreement under the FIPA. The court noted that even if it were to consider La-Z-Boy a franchisor under the FIPA, the plaintiff did not dispute that it owed over $5 million in past-due invoices to La-Z-Boy, a violation of the retailer agreement. 

The court also rejected the plaintiff’s other argument, that the parties had an oral understanding that La-Z-Boy had promised its financial support while the plaintiff acquired and improved stores in Seattle. The plaintiff alleged that, based on that promise, it believed that it could defer payment of the debt—presumably in perpetuity—until it was able to repay La-Z-Boy with store profits. The court held that the merger clause in the parties’ agreement foreclosed plaintiff’s claim of an oral agreement. In denying the motion, the court characterized the plaintiff’s debt as “significant” and noted that it is “loathe to require parties to continue a business relationship that is not working.”

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors