Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Court Declines Invitation to Stray From Language of Agreement
Posted in Contracts

In a decision from the Western District of New York, a magistrate judge relied on the plain language of a distribution agreement to determine its scope. Precimed Inc. v. ECA Medical Instruments, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10349 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2014). ECA, a manufacturer of both standard and custom surgical instruments, entered into a distribution agreement for Precimed to market and sell ECA's "Products." After a disagreement as to the scope of the term "Products," the parties filed opposing claims regarding whether the distribution agreement gave Precimed exclusive rights to distribute ECA's custom products in addition to its standard products. 

Applying Delaware law and citing the plain language of the parties' agreements, the judge recommended denying Precimed's motion for a declaratory judgment. In reaching this conclusion, the court noted that the language defining "Products" did not include custom products. Further, the court rejected Precimed's argument that inclusion of custom products in the definition of "Products" should be inferred. The court observed that terms are inferred only when doing so is necessary to give effect to parties' intentions. In this case, the agreement remained effective without custom products. The court also rejected Precimed's argument that custom products should be included in the definition of "Products" based on the parties' course of performance. Applying the UCC, the court found no evidence of such a course of performance, and, in any event, the agreement required a signed writing to modify its terms.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here


















Blog Authors