Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Court Awards Past Due Fees and Liquidated Damages
Posted in Damages

In a case litigated by Gray Plant Mooty on behalf of Radisson Hotels International, Inc., a Minnesota federal court recently awarded more than $300,000 to compensate franchisor RHI for past due fees and liquidated damages owed by a former franchisee. In Radisson Hotels Int’l, Inc. v. KaanAm, LLC, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3208 (D. Minn. Jan. 12, 2011), RHI had terminated a New York franchisee’s license agreement because of nonpayment. RHI sued in Minnesota seeking to recover past due fees owed for the time that the franchisee operated the hotel, along with liquidated damages for lost future fees as provided by the license agreement. The license agreement had a venue clause calling for all litigation to be filed in Minnesota.

The franchisee argued that RHI’s attempt to recover liquidated damages barred it from also recovering past due fees. The court rejected that argument, finding that the liquidated damages clause compensated RHI for lost future fees, an entirely distinct category of damages from the past due fees owed under the license agreement. The court also rejected the franchisee’s argument that RHI had breached the agreement, finding that the franchisee had failed to pay amounts owed to RHI. The court noted that even had RHI breached the license agreement in some way, such breach would not have justified the franchisee’s continued use of RHI’s trademarks and business system without compensation. Turning to the specific liquidated damages clause at issue, the court found the formula contained in the license agreement to be reasonable under New York law. It awarded RHI the fees it requested in its complaint, and invited RHI to move for an award of its attorneys’ fees, as provided for in the license agreement.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors