Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Colorado Federal Court Rejects Franchisor's Bases for Termination
Posted in Terminations

In what will likely become one of the most quoted franchise opinions of the year, a Colorado federal district judge has ruled against Quizno’s in a case the franchisor brought against a terminated former franchisee for injunctive relief and breach of contract. Quizno’s Franchising II LLC v. Zig Zag Rest. Group, LLC, Case No. 06CV10765, Bus. Franchise Guide (CCH) ¶14,046 (D. Colo. Dec. 31, 2008).  The court found Quiznos’ “whole charade of ‘terminating’ and ‘defaulting’ franchisees who failed [a] field test was just that—a charade—driven not by Quiznos’ genuine concern about whether its franchisees were making sandwiches to spec, but rather by its overriding public relations desire to be able to proceed with its national advertising campaign targeting Subway.”

In this case, the defendant franchisees, a husband and wife owning a single Quizno’s shop, received an automatic non-curable termination notice after a mystery shopper determined the franchisee’s sandwiches contained less than four ounces of meat when the system standard was five ounces for the new menu item. In what the court called the “Post-Termination Shadow Land,” the franchisee then was invited to continue running the Quizno’s franchise, but was simultaneously removed from the chain’s store locators system and cut off from non-food supplies. The court concluded that “by permitting [the franchisee] to continue to operate as a Quizno’s outlet, when the notice of termination and [the Franchise Agreement] specifically required [the franchisee] to cease operating, Quizno’s waived its right to terminate [the franchisee] and to seek damages for breach, and is in any event estopped from making those claims.” Another interesting tidbit from this case is the court’s determination that it was Quizno’s, and not the franchisee, that should have mitigated damages “over an agonizing period of 14 months of slow kill.” 

It is the sensational writing style of this opinion that will likely put it high on “most cited” list, but the lesson here is that the system-wide practices of franchisors need to be well documented in each case and followed carefully, lest they end up the centerpiece of litigation.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors