In Black Angus Holdings, LLC v. Back Yard Burgers, Inc. (In re Black Angus Holdings, LLC), 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 995 (Bankr. D. Kan. Mar. 24, 2010), a Kansas federal bankruptcy court declined to dismiss a franchisee’s breach of contract claim arising out of the opening of a restaurant in an area that overlapped with the franchisee’s protected area. The franchise agreement between the parties prevented the franchisor from establishing another restaurant within an “exclusive radius” of two miles from the franchisee’s restaurant. After the franchisor established a new franchise 2.17 miles away, the franchisee alleged it could no longer sustain its business and was forced into bankruptcy. Although the parties agreed the new restaurant was located outside the protected area, the franchisee argued that its area overlapped with that of the new restaurant. In denying the franchisor’s motion, the court held the use of the phrase “exclusive radius” in the franchise agreements could be read to suggest that franchisees’ protected areas would not overlap with each other.
The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.
About this Publication
The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP.
To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here.
RSS Feed