Menu
Blog Banner Image

The Franchise Memorandum

Appeals Court Upholds Cancellation of Fraudulently Procured Trademark Under “Actual Knowledge” Standard
Posted in Trademarks

In MPC Franchise, LLC v. Tarntino, 2016 WL 3512500 (2d Cir. June 27, 2016), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a ruling cancelling a federal trademark registration on the grounds that it was obtained by fraud in violation of the Lanham Act. MPC, a franchisor of Pudgie’s pizza restaurants in upstate New York, brought suit against a nephew of the original Pudgie’s founder after the nephew, Brent Tarntino, applied for and received registration of the mark PUDGIE’S for use with restaurant services. MPC alleged that Tarntino procured the mark fraudulently when he certified in his application that he was the sole owner of the mark, despite knowing that MPC was already franchising pizzerias using the same mark.

The court’s ruling centered on whether Tarntino actually knew that the statements in his trademark application were false, or whether he merely should have known about those falsehoods. Relying largely on the precedent set by In re Bose Corp., 580 F.3d 1240 (Fed. Cir. 2009), Tarntino argued that the standard for fraud on the PTO is actual knowledge. The court agreed, but found that even under this more stringent standard, Tarntino still committed fraud because there was abundant evidence that he knew at the time of his application that other Pudgie’s restaurants were using the same mark.

Email LinkedIn Twitter Facebook

The information contained in this post is provided to alert you to legal developments and should not be considered legal advice. It is not intended to and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Specific questions about how this information affects your particular situation should be addressed to one of the individuals listed. No representations or warranties are made with respect to this information, including, without limitation, as to its completeness, timeliness, or accuracy, and Lathrop GPM shall not be liable for any decision made in connection with the information. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely on advertisements.

About this Publication

The Franchise Memorandum is a collection of postings on summaries of recent legal developments of interest to franchisors brought to you by Lathrop GPM LLP. 

To subscribe to monthly emails for The Franchise Memorandum, please click here

Topics

Archives

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

Blog Authors