Michael L. Sturm
Michael has nearly three decades of experience litigating on behalf of franchisors in federal and state courts across the country and in arbitration proceedings. His experience includes virtually every type of substantive claim that arises in the course of the franchise relationship, including alleged violations of statutory disclosure and relationship obligations, claims of physical and internet encroachment of exclusive territories, claims of fraud and nondisclosure, claims with respect to supplier payments, alleged violations of antitrust laws, contractual disputes, and claims under the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Michael also has extensive experience with the jurisdictional and procedural issues that arise frequently in franchise litigation, including litigation with franchisee associations and multi-party litigation.
In addition to his work on behalf of franchisors, Michael has broad experience in complex, high-stakes commercial litigation matters. Among other matters, he has represented a satellite radio provider and terrestrial broadcasters in expert-driven rate setting proceedings. Michael has represented both relators and defendants in federal False Claims Act litigation. He has also served as lead counsel in cases involving intellectual property rights, including enforcement of patents, trademarks, and copyrights. With his background in antitrust, Michael also regularly represents trade associations whose members include major consumer products manufacturers.
Michael spoke at the IFA Legal Symposium, and previously has spoken at the annual ABA Forum on Franchising, and other industry events. He has covered topics ranging from the fundamentals of franchise litigation to specialized topics such as the application and scope of rules limiting the admissibility of settlement discussions and agreements in subsequent litigation. This work has appeared in the Franchise Law Journal, Perspective in Antitrust and other publications.
- Won motion to dismiss in putative antitrust class action based on anti-poaching provision in franchise agreement
- Won summary judgment for major franchisor in case alleging fraud and antitrust violations
- Defeated temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction sought by franchisees to enjoin application of supplier restrictions in franchise agreements
- Successfully briefed and argued appeals in federal circuit courts
- Obtained numerous preliminary injunctions against post-termination use of franchisors’ trademarks and systems
- Tried an employment case to a defense jury verdict on behalf of a small, family-owned franchisor
- Obtained complete exclusion of the defendants’ expert witnesses in retail lease dispute
- Successfully applied abstention doctrines to obtain dismissal of duplicative franchisee-initiated litigation in federal court
- District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- “Legal Eagle,” Franchise Times, 2020
- American Bar Association – Forum Committee on Franchising, Section of Litigation, Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice, and Section of Intellectual Property Law
- Author, 10 suggestions for franchise systems on how they can respond to the coronavirus crisis, Global Franchise, March 16, 2020
- Author, The State of Washington’s Attempt to Ban Franchise Anti-Poaching Provisions Nationwide Violates Constitutional Limitations on State Power to Regulate National Commerce, Franchise Law Journal, Fall 2019
- April 1, 2020
- March 18, 2020
- January 2, 2020
- April 12, 2018
600 New Hampshire Avenue, NWThe Watergate - Suite 700Washington, DC 20037
Harvard Law School, J.D., cum laude
The College of William & Mary, B.A.
- Phi Beta Kappa